Sunday, July 23, 2006

I am proud of America - - but the liberal media would have you believe otherwise

I am proud of our troops.

The mainstream liberal media would rather you believe that U.S. troops in Iraq are guilty of oppression, murder, and that they oppose the war effort. The liberal media would have you believe that we are losing the war and our troops think so too. Fact is: Our troops are winning the war, regardless of the media's attemps to undermine the effort, or the New York Times' efforts to sabotage the war. Our troops are upholding the highest standards of decency and selflessness in their effort to free the Iraqi people from the tyranny of freedom-hating terrorist fanatics.

I am proud of Israel.

The conflict they find themselves in is simple to understand, though the liberal media claim that the Israeli Defense Force are the terrorists. The liberal press call the invasion "Israeli occupation," "an attempt to gain more Jewish settlements," "a cycle of violence perpetrated by Israel," "more proof of the rise of the Zionist Empire," and so forth. CNN actually has stated that Israel is acting "disproportionately" in responding to Hezbollah's attacks. The Secretary-General of the United Nations, Kofi Annan, said, "I condemn without reservations the attack in southern Lebanon." He went on to describe Israel's military response as "terrorism." As usual, the liberal press and liberal political worldview is sympathetic to terrorists, but has forgotten that Israel is only a tiny sliver of land amidst a vast sea of enemies. The liberals seem to forget that Israel is a nation of 7 million, with a military of about 200,000 personnel surrounded by Arab nations and other Muslim enemies of Israel (which does not necessarily mean every Arab and every Muslim) that desire the destruction of Israel. Iran, Syria, Al-Quaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas, the Palestinians, and a vast sea of other groups and nations support terror against Israel, and want the Jewish nation, and every Jewish person on the planet, annihilated. In 1947-48 the Arab states tried to destroy the tiny Jewish state as the United Nations worked at forming Israel. In 1967 a number of Arab nations tried to destroy Israel in the Six-Day War. Two months after that war the Arab countries convened in Sudan and announced on September 1, 1967 that regarding Israel there will be no peace, no recognition, and no negotiations. Six years later, in 1973, Egypt invaded the Israeli-held Sinai Peninsula, setting up a bull-crap treaty in 1978 that gave the entire oil-rich Sinai Peninsula back to Egypt. Then, three years later Sadat of Egypt was murdered by an Egyption Muslim Terrorist group, a move vocally supported by the Palestinian Liberation Organization, because Sadat deserved the death for doing the unforgiveable: he had recognized Israel and made peace with her. Israel aches for peace so bad that the Palestinians could probably have the West Bank and Gaza tomorrow if they and the Arab League recognized Israel, normalized relations, and renounced violence against the Jewish State. Give Israel peace, and Israel will give you land. They proved that with Egypt in 1978. Israel made such a promise to Arafat during the Clinton Administration, offering 97 percent of the West Bank and 3 percent of Israeli land in exchange for peace. Palestine's rejection of the offer was followed by Israeli citizens being routinely blown up by Palestinian terrorists. They don't want to share land with the Jews. They want "the pirate state of Israel" destroyed. They state that a true Arab wishes for Israel's demise, and will settle for no less. CNN is right, the war going on is disproportionate, but the disproportion is against Israel. I am glad that Israel is not just talking the talk, but walking the walk. They have every right to defend themselves.

I am disappointed that the liberal media has become a worse enemy to the United States than has the terrorists.

Radical Islam spreads terror because they hate us for our freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and because we refuse to treat women as second-class citizens, we don't kill gays, and we are a free society. The liberal press claims to be our window into the news of the world, then acts recklessly in total disregard of our safety. Last December when the New York Times ran the story revealing that the NSA was conducting electronic surveillance of calls from suspected Al-Qaeda terrorists overseas to persons in the United States I was appalled. Not because of what the NSA was doing. I was appalled at the fact that an American News Agency would undermine a war effort during a critical time of the war. Then they printed the story about how we were tracking terrorists through their bank transactions. Again, the paper committed treason against the United States. And in these cases, along with a dozen others that I don't have time to talk about, the U.S. government asked the Times not to publish the story, and they did. But if the government prosecutes the press for this, they will use their power of brainwashing the people into believing more polls rating the president as a failure. Why does the Times, or any of the other Liberal News Agencies, do this? Do they hate America? Do they dislike their freedoms? Do they wish that we will be attacked again? The press is at war with Bush and our troops as we are at war with merciless enemies that could care less if they killed our children in a cowardly terrorist attack. The press is an enemy that must be contained. They must stop their treasonous activities. They must cease or we will lose our freedom.

And through this all, the Times stated that they are upset because they are being singled out.

What kind of lapse of logic are they suffering from? Are they truly that stupid?

Unfortunately, the answer is "Yes."

1 comment:

Gunny John said...

The MSM, and the NYT specifically make all of their decisions based on emotion, not logic. "Will doing this hurt Bush?" That's what they ask themselves prior to making any decision.